DraftKings Settles ‘Corporate Espionage’ Lawsuit Vs. Former Exec

DraftKings Settles ‘Corporate Espionage’ Lawsuit Vs. Former Exec.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

DraftKings has settled a legal spat with its former head of VIP, Michael Hermalyn, whom the operator accused of “” after the executive jumped ship to its rival, Fanatics.

Michael Hermalyn, DraftKings, Fanatics, Michael Rubin, corporate espionageMichael Hermalyn, above, denied DraftKings’ allegations, but he is severely restricted in the duties he can perform for Fanatics until February 1. (Image: Cheddar)

The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed, but it comes three months after the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston rejected Hermalyn s bid to overturn a lower court injunction that severely restricted the type of work he could do at Fanatics.

The lower court determined last April that a noncompete clause Hermalyn signed while at DraftKings was enforceable.

‘Stolen’ Super Bowl Plan

Boston-based DraftKings sued Hermalyn in Massachusetts in February 2004 claiming he plotted to join Fanatics for over a year before leaving. The lawsuit alleged he took with him confidential information about DraftKings’ VIP clients, along with its Super Bowl business plan.

Fanatics is best known as a platform that sells licensed sports merchandise, trading cards, and collectibles, but in late 2004, it launched a sportsbook. At some point, the company invited Hermalyn to join as president of its VIP program, although when this actually happened is disputed.

the DraftKings allegations. He claimed he didn’t have an offer to join Fanatics until January 2024 and denied secretly discussing employment with anyone else at the company in 2023.

He also denied sharing any documents with Fanatics or having access to any DraftKings files after his resignation.

Hermalyn further argued that California’s Business Professions Code prohibits an employer from enforcing a noncompete agreement regardless of whether the contract was signed outside of California. While Fanatics is based in Jacksonville, Fla., Hermalyn was hired to head up its Los Angeles office.

California Suit

As such, he filed his own lawsuit in California to challenge the noncompete agreement. The judge in that case determined Hermalyn would likely prevail under California law, but declined to act because he said there would have to be exceptional circumstances to interfere with a court ruling in another state.

Hermalyn is enjoined from providing services to Fanatics that relate to any aspect of DraftKings business for a year from the date he started his new job – a period that is due to end on February 1, 2025.

All litigation between them has been settled and dismissed on confidential terms, and Mr. Hermalyn will abide by his contractual commitments to DraftKings, Russell Beck, a lawyer for Hermalyn, said in a statement to Reuters.

Article Sources
Atlantic City Casino Union Claims Victory, as New Contracts Reached editorial policy.
  1. Louisiana Moving Cash from Dormant Sports Betting Accounts to Unclaimed Property Fund

Compare Accounts
×
Australian Casinos Test Facial Recognition, Concept Faces Controversy
Provider
Name
Description
California Sports Betting Update: Monday Likely a Pivotal Day for Online Measure  Los Angeles Developer Guilty of Bribing City Councilman with Casino Chips  UK Online Gambling Could See £2 Stake as Government Prepares to Publish White Paper  Star Sydney Housed ‘Illegal’ Suncity Casino Within Casino, Lawyers Claim  Romania’s 40 Percent Tax on Gambling Withdrawals May Benefit Black Market  New Zealand Bets on Massive Investment to Tackle Gambling Harm  Colombia Busts 11 in Illegal Gambling Ring as Crackdown Continues  Deadwood Casino Regulators Uphold Ban on Poker Player Appealing Blacklist Inclusion  California Sports Betting Update: What to Know About Prop 26 and Prop 27  Wynn Macau Licensing Agreement Limited to $74.5M